Hi Michael,
I concur with all Elise’s comments regarding using good judgement, finding the best fit between artist and commission/project, adjusting to fit the budget size, etc.
We award an extra point for local artists in the scoring for individual project panels, and Oakland is committed to awarding
a majority of commissions to Oakland-based artists (a goal we’ve achieved without applying a more official mandate).
I’m proud that we’ve been able to sustain that commitment without formal preferences, but also recognize we need to adapt our models to address the regional challenges facing our artist community.
As within the AFTA – PAN community, our advisory committee and staff have frequently discussed the need to provide opportunities for entry into the public art field and to facilitate professional development for local artists who may not
have the extensive experience to secure a six-figure, or even five-figure, commission. Our Cultural Funding Program provides one avenue of entry but we need to partner on more intentional models.
Finally, we will be analyzing our selection processes further in the coming year, as we conduct and equity analysis of all our programs in keeping with Oakland’s Cultural Plan. Please do share your findings on best practices!
Kristen
Kristen Zaremba
Public Art Coordinator
Economic & Workforce Development Department
City of Oakland
1 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 9th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612
510-238-2155 /
kzaremba@oaklandca.gov
http://www.oaklandculturalarts.org or
http://www.oaklandca.gov
From: public_art_network@americansforthearts.simplelists.com [mailto:public_art_network@americansforthearts.simplelists.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 8:43 AM
To: public_art_network@americansforthearts.simplelists.com
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Local and Non-local preferences
|
CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Oakland. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and expect the message. |
Hey Michael,
In general, we want to make sure we select the best artist for that particular commission, so we do not have any overall parameters or restrictions for local v. non-local artists. We make the determination based on the project type and
budget. If a project has a limited budget, that sometimes leads us to restrict the call to more local artists to ensure less of the budget goes to transportation and hotel costs. Sometimes panelists or stakeholders voice a preference for local or regional
artists, so occasionally we will have a bonus point in the scoring for that.
I hope this helps.
Best,
Elise
|
|
Elise DeMarzo | Public Art Program Director
1313 Newell Road | Palo Alto, CA 94303 D: 650.617.3517 | E:
elise.demarzo@cityofpaloalto.org www.cityofpaloalto.org/publicart
Facebook: facebook.com/publicartpa |
|
|
|
|
Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you. |
||
From:
public_art_network@americansforthearts.simplelists.com <public_art_network@americansforthearts.simplelists.com>
On Behalf Of Ogilvie, Michael
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 8:19 AM
To:
public_art_network@americansforthearts.simplelists.com
Subject: Local and Non-local preferences
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
Dear PAN Members,
I am looking for data regarding local preference policies for public art programs. Specifically, does your program restrict calls to artists to locals only, or place a 50% local/50% non-local type of filter on artist selections for RFQ’s?
If you have any information regarding this, please let me know.
Thank you,
Michael Ogilvie
City of San José
Director of Public Art
(408) 793-4338 phone
To unsubscribe from this list please go to
http://archives.simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=ezIg32ylrsBQImhdFEpMPziuq3OcPBAh